Samsung Remote Server Client Architecture

  
(Redirected from Remoting)
  1. Samsung Remote Server Client Architecture Approach
  2. Client Server Architecture Advantages
  3. Samsung Remote Server Account
  4. Client Server Architecture
  5. Remote Server Definition

Client-server architecture, architecture of a computer network in which many clients (remote processors) request and receive service from a centralized server (host computer). Client computers provide an interface to allow a computer user to request services of the server and to display the results the server returns. Unlock Samsung by cable & Samsung unlock code services world wide. Your # 1 trusted Samsung. Sections of this page. Info and Ads. See more of Simlock Remote Server on Facebook. Create New Account. See more of Simlock Remote Server on Facebook. Forgot account? Create New Account. With Windows Server 2008 R2, RDS replaced Terminal Services as Microsoft's thin-client technology, enabling users to access desktops virtually. Remote Desktop Services (RDS) is built into Windows operating systems and allows data to exist in a central location, simplifying management for systems administrators.

In distributed computing, a remote procedure call (RPC) is when a computer program causes a procedure (subroutine) to execute in a different address space (commonly on another computer on a shared network), which is coded as if it were a normal (local) procedure call, without the programmer explicitly coding the details for the remote interaction. That is, the programmer writes essentially the same code whether the subroutine is local to the executing program, or remote.[1] This is a form of client–server interaction (caller is client, executor is server), typically implemented via a request–response message-passing system. In the object-oriented programming paradigm, RPC calls are represented by remote method invocation (RMI). The RPC model implies a level of location transparency, namely that calling procedures is largely the same whether it is local or remote, but usually they are not identical, so local calls can be distinguished from remote calls. Remote calls are usually orders of magnitude slower and less reliable than local calls, so distinguishing them is important.

RPCs are a form of inter-process communication (IPC), in that different processes have different address spaces: if on the same host machine, they have distinct virtual address spaces, even though the physical address space is the same; while if they are on different hosts, the physical address space is different. Many different (often incompatible) technologies have been used to implement the concept.

  • 2Message passing
  • 4Analogues

History and origins[edit]

Response–request protocols date to early distributed computing in the late 1960s, theoretical proposals of remote procedure calls as the model of network operations date to the 1970s, and practical implementations date to the early 1980s. Bruce Jay Nelson is generally credited with coining the term 'remote procedure call' in 1981.[2]

Remote procedure calls used in modern operating systems trace their roots back to the RC 4000 multiprogramming system,[3] which used a request-response communication protocol for process synchronization.[4] The idea of treating network operations as remote procedure calls goes back at least to the 1970s in early ARPANET documents.[5] In 1978, Per Brinch Hansen proposed Distributed Processes, a language for distributed computing based on 'external requests' consisting of procedure calls between processes.[6]

One of the earliest practical implementations was in 1982 by Brian Randell and colleagues for their Newcastle Connection between UNIX machines.[7] This was soon followed by 'Lupine' by Andrew Birrell and Bruce Nelson in the Cedar environment at Xerox PARC.[8][9][10] Lupine automatically generated stubs, providing type-safe bindings, and used an efficient protocol for communication.[9] One of the first business uses of RPC was by Xerox under the name 'Courier' in 1981. The first popular implementation of RPC on Unix was Sun's RPC (now called ONC RPC), used as the basis for Network File System (NFS).

In the 1990s, with the popularity of object-oriented programming, the alternative model of remote method invocation (RMI) was widely implemented, such as in Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA, 1991) and Java remote method invocation. RMIs in turn fell in popularity with the rise of the internet, particularly in the 2000s.

Message passing[edit]

RPC is a request–response protocol. An RPC is initiated by the client, which sends a request message to a known remote server to execute a specified procedure with supplied parameters. The remote server sends a response to the client, and the application continues its process. While the server is processing the call, the client is blocked (it waits until the server has finished processing before resuming execution), unless the client sends an asynchronous request to the server, such as an XMLHttpRequest. There are many variations and subtleties in various implementations, resulting in a variety of different (incompatible) RPC protocols.

An important difference between remote procedure calls and local calls is that remote calls can fail because of unpredictable network problems. Also, callers generally must deal with such failures without knowing whether the remote procedure was actually invoked. Idempotent procedures (those that have no additional effects if called more than once) are easily handled, but enough difficulties remain that code to call remote procedures is often confined to carefully written low-level subsystems.

Explain client server architecture

Sequence of events[edit]

  1. The client calls the client stub. The call is a local procedure call, with parameters pushed on to the stack in the normal way.
  2. The client stub packs the parameters into a message and makes a system call to send the message. Packing the parameters is called marshalling.
  3. The client's local operating system sends the message from the client machine to the server machine.
  4. The local operating system on the server machine passes the incoming packets to the server stub.
  5. The server stub unpacks the parameters from the message. Unpacking the parameters is called unmarshalling.
  6. Finally, the server stub calls the server procedure. The reply traces the same steps in the reverse direction.

Samsung Remote Server Client Architecture Approach

Standard contact mechanisms[edit]

To let different clients access servers, a number of standardized RPC systems have been created. Most of these use an interface description language (IDL) to let various platforms call the RPC. The IDL files can then be used to generate code to interface between the client and servers.

Analogues[edit]

Client server architecture ppt

Notable RPC implementations and analogues include:

Night at the Museum Secret of the Tomb (2014) Movie BluRay 300MB March 2, 2015 Hollywood Movies N. Night at the museum 2 nov 300mb. ||Night at the Museum (2006)|| [300MB| BRRip| 420p| Hin-Eng] Director: Shawn Levy Release Date: 29 December 2006 Genre: Action| Adventure| Comedy Stars: Ben Stiller, Carla Gugino and Ricky Gervais. Storyline: In New York, unemployed and divorced Larry Daley is a complete loser. His son Nick is very disappointed with his father who is going to be evicted. Storyline: At the Museum of Natural History, there’s a new exhibit being unveiled. Larry Daley, who manages the night exhibit where the exhibits come to life because of the Tablet of Ahkmenrah, is in charge of the presentation. But when the exhibits go awry, Larry finds himself in trouble. Night at the museum Pt 3 Upload in english or update its links. Ss says: December 25th, 2015 at 12:20 pm. Hello bro Night at the museum all parts are in english not in hindi so please upload in dual audio or in hindi 300mb. Admin says: December 25th, 2015 at 2:14 pm. I will upload @ss. Night At The Museum – Battle Of The Smithsonian (2009) Dual Audio Hindi BluRay 480p 300MB 300MB Movies, Dual Audio Movies SSR Movies 2 years ago No Comments.

Language-specific[edit]

  • Java's Java Remote Method Invocation (Java RMI) API provides similar functionality to standard Unix RPC methods.
  • Modula-3's network objects, which were the basis for Java's RMI[11]
  • RPyC implements RPC mechanisms in Python, with support for asynchronous calls.
  • Distributed Ruby (DRb) allows Ruby programs to communicate with each other on the same machine or over a network. DRb uses remote method invocation (RMI) to pass commands and data between processes.
  • Erlang is process oriented and natively supports distribution and RPCs via message passing between nodes and local processes alike.
  • Elixir builds on top of the Erlang VM and allows process communication (Elixir/Erlang processes, not OS processes) of the same network out-of-the-box via Agents and message passing.

Application-specific[edit]

  • Action Message Format (AMF) allows Adobe Flex applications to communicate with back-ends or other applications that support AMF.
  • Remote Function Call is the standard SAP interface for communication between SAP systems. RFC calls a function to be executed in a remote system.

General[edit]

  • NFS (Network File System) is one of the most prominent users of RPC
  • Open Network Computing Remote Procedure Call, by Sun Microsystems
  • D-Bus open source IPC program provides similar function to CORBA.
  • SORCER provides the API and exertion-oriented language (EOL) for a federated method invocation
  • XML-RPC is an RPC protocol that uses XML to encode its calls and HTTP as a transport mechanism.
  • JSON-RPC is an RPC protocol that uses JSON-encoded messages
  • JSON-WSP is an RPC protocol that uses JSON-encoded messages
  • SOAP is a successor of XML-RPC and also uses XML to encode its HTTP-based calls.
  • ZeroC's Internet Communications Engine (Ice) distributed computing platform.
  • Etch framework for building network services.
  • Apache Thrift protocol and framework.
  • CORBA provides remote procedure invocation through an intermediate layer called the object request broker.
  • Libevent provides a framework for creating RPC servers and clients.[12]
  • Windows Communication Foundation is an application programming interface in the .NET framework for building connected, service-oriented applications.
  • Microsoft .NETRemoting offers RPC facilities for distributed systems implemented on the Windows platform. It has been superseded by WCF.
  • The Microsoft DCOM uses MSRPC which is based on DCE/RPC
  • The Open Software Foundation DCE/RPC Distributed Computing Environment (also implemented by Microsoft).
  • Google Protocol Buffers (protobufs) package includes an interface definition language used for its RPC protocols[13] open sourced in 2015 as gRPC.[14]
  • WAMP combines RPC and Publish-Subscribe into a single, transport-agnostic protocol.
  • Google Web Toolkit uses an asynchronous RPC to communicate to the server service.[15]
  • Apache Avro provides RPC where client and server exchange schemas in the connection handshake and code generation is not required.
  • Embedded RPC is lightweight RPC implementation developed by NXP, targeting primary CortexM cores
  • KF Trusted Execution Environment uses proxy and objects marshaling to communicate objects across sandboxes

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H.; Arpaci-Dusseau, Andrea C. (2014), Introduction to Distributed Systems(PDF), Arpaci-Dusseau Books
  2. ^Bruce Jay Nelson (May 1981). Remote Procedure Call. PARC CSL-81-9 (Also CMU-CS-81-119). Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. PhD thesis.
  3. ^'Per Brinch Hansen • IEEE Computer Society'. www.computer.org. Retrieved 2015-12-15.
  4. ^Brinch Hansen, Per (1969). RC 4000 Computer Software: Multiprogramming System(PDF). Copenhagen, Denmark: Regnecentralen.
  5. ^James E. White (December 23, 1975). 'A High-Level Framework for Network-Based Resource Sharing'. RFC 707. Augmentation Research Center. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  6. ^Brinch Hansen, Per (November 1978). 'Distributed processes: a concurrent programming concept'(PDF). Communications of the ACM. 21 (11): 934–941. CiteSeerX10.1.1.107.3108. doi:10.1145/359642.359651.
  7. ^Brownbridge, David R.; Marshall, Lindsay F.; Randell, Brian (1982). 'The Newcastle Connection'(PDF). Software – Practice and Experience. 12 (12): 1147–1162. doi:10.1002/spe.4380121206. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2016-08-16. Retrieved 2016-08-16.
  8. ^Birrell, Andrew D.; Nelson, Bruce Jay (1984). 'Implementing remote procedure calls'(PDF). ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. 2: 39–59. doi:10.1145/2080.357392.
  9. ^ ab'1994 – Andrew Birrell, Bruce Nelson: Remote Procedure Call'. Software System Award citation. Association for Computing Machinery. Archived from the original on April 2, 2012. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  10. ^'SIGOPS Hall of Fame Award'. Special Interest Group on Operating Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  11. ^The A-Z of Programming Languages: Modula-3 - a-z of programming languagesArchived 2009-01-05 at the Wayback Machine. Computerworld. Retrieved on 2013-07-17.
  12. ^libevent: Main Page. Monkey.org. Retrieved on 2013-07-17.
  13. ^'Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format'. Google project website. Retrieved November 1, 2011.
  14. ^'gRPC open-source universal RPC framework'. Google project website. Retrieved September 7, 2016.
  15. ^'Google Web Toolkit'. Google project website. Retrieved November 1, 2011.

External links[edit]

  • RFC 1057 - Specifies version 1 of ONC RPC
  • RFC 5531 - Specifies version 2 of ONC RPC
  • Remote Procedure Calls (RPC) — A tutorial on ONC RPC by Dr Dave Marshall of Cardiff University
  • Introduction to RPC Programming — A developer's introduction to RPC and XDR, from SGI IRIX documentation.

Client Server Architecture Advantages

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Remote_procedure_call&oldid=913091388'

Build your test lab with Boot-to-VHD. Here are the steps.
Deploy a VM to cloud and build your lab in Windows Azure with 90-day free trial. Here's how.
Preping for Microsoft certifications? Join our Windows Server 2012'Early Experts' Study Group.


In Windows Server 2008 R2 (WS2008R2), Terminal Services (TS) has been expanded and renamed to Remote Desktop Services (RDS). RDS is the backbone of Microsoft's VDI solutions. And in Windows Server 2012, RDS is further enhanced and with a scenario-based configuration wizard. Still the concept and architecture remain very much the same since WS2008R2. The new and enhanced architecture takes advantage of virtualization and makes remote access a much flexible solution with new deployment scenarios. To realize the capabilities of RDS, it is essential to understand the functions of key architectural components and how they complement one another to process a RDS request. There are many new terms and acronyms to get familiar with in the context of RDS. For the remainder of this post, notice RDS implies the server platform of WS2008R2 and later, while TS implies WS2008.

Samsung Remote Server Account

There are five main architectural components in RDS, as shown, and all require a RDS licensing server. Each component includes a set of features designed to achieve particular functions. Together, the five form a framework for accessing Terminal Services applications, remote desktops, and virtual desktops all with WS2008R2 capabilities. Essentially, WS2008R2 offers a set of building blocks with essential functions for constructing enterprise remote access infrastructure.

To start, a user will access a RDS webpage by specifying an URL where RDS resources are published to. This interface, provided by Remote Desktop Web Access (RDWA) and configured with a local IIS with SSL, is the web access point to RemoteApp and VDI. The URL is consistent regardless how resources are organized, composed, and published from multiple RDS session hosts behind the scene. By default, RDS publishes resources at https://the-FQDN-of-a-RDWA-server/rdweb and this URL is the only information a system administrator needs to provide to a user for accessing authorized resources via RDS. A user will need to be authenticated with one’s AD credentials when accessing the URL and the RemoteApp programs presented by this URL is trimmed with access control list. Namely, an authenticated user will see and be able to access only authorized RemoteApp programs.

Remote Desktop Gateway (RDG) is optional and functions very much the same with that in TS. A RDG is to be placed at the edge of a corporate network to filter out incoming RDS requests by referencing criteria defined in a designated Network Policy Server (NPS). With a server certificate, RDG offers secure remote access to RDS infrastructure. As far as a system administrator is concerned, RDG is the boundary of a RDS network. There are two policies in NPS relevant to an associated RDG:

  • One is Connection Authorization Policy or CAP. I call it a user authorization list, showing who can access an associated RDG
  • The other is Resource Authorization Policy or RAP. In essence, this is a resource list specifying which devices a CAP user can connect to via an associated RDG.

In RDS, applications are installed and published in a Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) similar to a TS Session Host, or simply a Terminal Server in a TS solution. A RDSH loads applications, crunches numbers, and produces results. It is our trusted and beloved working horse in a RDS solution. Digital signing can be easily enabled in a RDSH with a certificate. Multiple RDSHs can be deployed along with a load balancing technology. Which requires every RDSH in a load-balancing group to be identically configured with the same applications.

A noticeable enhancement in RDSH (as compared with TS Session Host) is the ability to trim the presence of a published application based on the access control list (ACL) of the application. An authorized user will see, hence have an access to, only published applications of which the user is included in the ACL. By default, the Everyone group is authorized in a published application’s ACL, and all connected user will have access to a published application.

Remote Desktop Virtualization Host (RDVH) is a new feature which serves requests for virtual desktops running in virtual machines, or VMs. A RDVH server is a Hyper-V based host, for instance a Windows Server with Hyper-V server role enabled. When serving a VM-based request, an associated RDVH will automatically start an intended VM, if the VM is not already running. And a user will always be prompted for credentials when accessing a virtual desktop. However, a RDVH does not directly accept connection requests and it uses a designated RDSH as a “redirector” for serving VM-based requests. The pairing of a RDVH and its redirector is defined in Remote Desktop Connection Broker (RDCB) when adding a RDVH as a resource.

Remote Desktop Connection Broker (RDCB), an expansion of the Terminal Services Session Broker in TS, provides a unified experience for setting up user access to traditional TS applications and virtual machine (VM)-based virtual desktops. Here, a virtual desktop can be running in either a designated VM, or a VM dynamically picked based on load balancing from a defined VM pool. A system administrator will use the RDCB console, called Remote Desktop Connection Manager, to include RDSHs, TS Servers, and RDVHs such that those applications published by the RDSHs and TS Servers, and those VMs running in RDVHs can be later composed and presented to users with a consistent URL by RDWA. And with this consistent URL, authenticated users can access authorized RemoteApp programs and virtual desktops.

A Remote Desktop (RD) Client gets connection information from the RDWA server in a RDS solution. If a RD client is outside of a corporate network, the client connects through a RDG. If a RD client is internal, the client can then directly connect to an intended RDSH or RDVH once RDCB provides the connection information. In both cases, RDCB plays a central role to make sure a client gets connected to a correct resource. With certificates, a system administrator can configure digital signing and single sign-on among RDS components to provide a great user experience with high security.

Client Server Architecture

Conceptually, RDCB is the chief intelligence and operation officer of a RDS solution and knows which is where, whom to talk to, and what to do with a RDS request. Before a logical connection can be established between a client and a target RDSH or RDVH, RDCB acts as a go-between passing and forwarding pertinent information to and from associated parties when serving a RDS request. From a 50,000-foot view, a remote client uses RDWA/RDG to obtain access to a target RDSH or RDVH, while RDCB connects the client to a session on the target RDSH, or an intended VM configured in a target RDVH. Above is a RDS architecture poster with visual presentation on how all flow together. Http://aka.ms/free has number of free e-books and this poster for additional information of WS2008R2 Active Directory, RDS, and other components.

The configuration in WS2008 is a bit challenging with many details easily overlooked. Windows Server 2012 has greatly improved the user experience by facilitating the configuration processes with a scenario-based wizard. Stay tuned and I will further discuss this in an upcoming blog post series.

Remote Server Definition

Recommended additional reading on RDS/VDI/App-V, cloud essentials, and private cloud